The Saturday Morning Hangover will be back on the air this Saturday. The time is still to be determined whether it will be at 10 or 11. We will do a comprehensive NFL preview as well as break down all of the big games in College Football. We look forward to an excellent semester on the air.
We also will be creating a Justin.tv account so our listeners can now become viewers and watch us live in the KAMP studios.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Seven Ways to Fix Baseball
It would seem in the midst of an NFL lockout approaching the 2011 season and with the NBA future still uncertain, now is the time for baseball to quickly fix itself to try and become what it once was. Baseball has literally become a past time rather than a pastime. Baseball as a dominant sport in America has been overshadowed by the NFL and any attempt to combat this has quickly been struck down by the fact that baseball lacks what football has. The NFL's ability to see the bottom feeder teams rise again to the top is something MLB could only dream of, in a league where money and power dominate the sport.
The first way to fix this problem is clearly the need for baseball to adapt a salary cap, much like one that all three major sports use. It is the most logical way to create parity amongst every major league team. No more of this New York Yankees $200 million payroll in which every free agent available ont he market wanting more than $20 million per year signs with the Yankees or Red Sox. There is nothing sensible about a league that allows the top payroll to be over $200 million and the bottom feeding Florida Marlins to spend $36 million. While this does fit in nicely with the American system of capitalism, sports is more than a business and equality does mean something. There is nothing wrong with capping the league at $100 million. That is a very fair number and may even be too much. This allows every team the opportunity to go after one or two big name free agents every year and that leaves plenty of available players for the rest of the league.
While many people may disagree and say that baseball doesn't need to have a salary cap, there are other ways to go about fixing this problem. How about re-shuffling the divisions every year? Think about taking every team and putting them in a hat and pulling out their team name to fit a spot in the division. One year the Yankees and Angels might be in the same division. The Indians and the Mariners could be in the same division. This creates the opportunity for a lot more parity around the league. This may sound like a crazy idea, but if the union won't allow a salary cap, this could be a solid alternative. New teams would be in the playoffs every year and this would definitely give the fans something to cheer about. Teams could contend one year and tank the next just based on where they play.
Arbitration needs to go. It is baseball's answer to the fact that they don't have a salary cap. Rather than have a salary cap and force teams to spend less money, they came up with a way to force smaller market teams to have to pay elite athletes that they really don't want to keep in the first place. The idea may be a nice thought but the reality of what arbitration accomplishes makes the idea crazy to even think about. There is nothing sensible about forcing your front office to bad mouth a player to try and persuade a judge to make you pay that player less money than he wants. This is a way in which elite players who come through the minor league systems are ensured a hefty payday before they hit the free agent market and eventually sign with the Yankees or Red Sox anyways.
Baseball could install a franchise tag system much like what the NFL does. This system allows teams to tag one player at a set price ensuring that that player will stay for at least one more year. The league is required to set the tag price based on the position of the player and if the team wants to keep that player without giving them a huge contract then they can slap a tag on them. This works great for a league where players have career years before tanking right after signing major contracts. The first two players to come to mind are Barry Zito and Vernon Wells who probably have the most untradeable contracts in all of sports. A franchise tage system would give teams a look at their players just a little bit more before they decide to lock them up. It also gives small market teams a chance to be able to hold onto some of their players before they hit the market. The Oakland A's would love to have done this with many of their young talented players that left for long term deals such as Miguel Tejada, Jason Giambi, Mark Mulder, Tim Hudson, Jermaine Dye, Ramon Hernandez, and Barry Zito.
It is time to expand the playoff system to five teams. The NFL sends six teams to the playoffs, the NBA and NHL send eight. It is time for baseball to add in another wild card team. We continue to see so often that wild card teams are able to make a run in the postseason because they are the teams that get hot at the right time right before the season ends. Last year we saw one of the most boring finishes to a baseball season in recent years and it was because almost all of the playoff races were locked up by the end of August. Baseball needs to add another wild card team and this will make for a much more exciting finish. Teams will be in the race longer and will be interested in buying more pieces at the trade deadline if they know that there is another spot for them. This would generate more fan interest and would be better for baseball.
Expanding the rosters to 40 man rosters fromt he start of the season rather than in September would give teams the opportunity to showcase more players at a major league level. There would be more trades and it would bring in more fan interest to the game if they were able to see new players all the time. Fans get tired of watching crappy players on the field while the GM is stuck with not being able to call up prospects due to the 25 man roster rule. Get rid of the 25 man roster and make it 40 which will bring in a lot more excitement.
It's time to get rid of the designated hitter rule. This was an attempt to make baseball mroe exciting and was brought in at a time when the NL and AL were worlds apart from each other to the point where they barely played under the same front office. The DH rule allows old veteran hitters who can still smack a few over the fence but can't catch a ball if they were perfectly positioned to play baseball. It allows pitchers to focuse solely on pitching and it makes managers look good because they have even less to do. The designated hitter has definitely had an effect on the game because it gives the AL an extra hitter. Wonder why the AL dominates interleague play? They have an extra hitter. When NL clubs try to use a DH during away games they have to use a bench player while the AL uses a normal every day guy. It is time to get rid of the rule and let everyone play under the same rules. The pitchers should have to hit, they are part of the game. Having a DH takes away the strategy from the game and there is just no reason for it. The rules should be the same for everyone.
The opportunities for the league lie int he hands of the MLB front office and if they don't realize that now is the time for them to capitalize on other league's lockouts they will never be able to reach their full potential. Baseball has all of the right pieces and it has the opportunity to become the best of the major sports.
The first way to fix this problem is clearly the need for baseball to adapt a salary cap, much like one that all three major sports use. It is the most logical way to create parity amongst every major league team. No more of this New York Yankees $200 million payroll in which every free agent available ont he market wanting more than $20 million per year signs with the Yankees or Red Sox. There is nothing sensible about a league that allows the top payroll to be over $200 million and the bottom feeding Florida Marlins to spend $36 million. While this does fit in nicely with the American system of capitalism, sports is more than a business and equality does mean something. There is nothing wrong with capping the league at $100 million. That is a very fair number and may even be too much. This allows every team the opportunity to go after one or two big name free agents every year and that leaves plenty of available players for the rest of the league.
While many people may disagree and say that baseball doesn't need to have a salary cap, there are other ways to go about fixing this problem. How about re-shuffling the divisions every year? Think about taking every team and putting them in a hat and pulling out their team name to fit a spot in the division. One year the Yankees and Angels might be in the same division. The Indians and the Mariners could be in the same division. This creates the opportunity for a lot more parity around the league. This may sound like a crazy idea, but if the union won't allow a salary cap, this could be a solid alternative. New teams would be in the playoffs every year and this would definitely give the fans something to cheer about. Teams could contend one year and tank the next just based on where they play.
Arbitration needs to go. It is baseball's answer to the fact that they don't have a salary cap. Rather than have a salary cap and force teams to spend less money, they came up with a way to force smaller market teams to have to pay elite athletes that they really don't want to keep in the first place. The idea may be a nice thought but the reality of what arbitration accomplishes makes the idea crazy to even think about. There is nothing sensible about forcing your front office to bad mouth a player to try and persuade a judge to make you pay that player less money than he wants. This is a way in which elite players who come through the minor league systems are ensured a hefty payday before they hit the free agent market and eventually sign with the Yankees or Red Sox anyways.
Baseball could install a franchise tag system much like what the NFL does. This system allows teams to tag one player at a set price ensuring that that player will stay for at least one more year. The league is required to set the tag price based on the position of the player and if the team wants to keep that player without giving them a huge contract then they can slap a tag on them. This works great for a league where players have career years before tanking right after signing major contracts. The first two players to come to mind are Barry Zito and Vernon Wells who probably have the most untradeable contracts in all of sports. A franchise tage system would give teams a look at their players just a little bit more before they decide to lock them up. It also gives small market teams a chance to be able to hold onto some of their players before they hit the market. The Oakland A's would love to have done this with many of their young talented players that left for long term deals such as Miguel Tejada, Jason Giambi, Mark Mulder, Tim Hudson, Jermaine Dye, Ramon Hernandez, and Barry Zito.
It is time to expand the playoff system to five teams. The NFL sends six teams to the playoffs, the NBA and NHL send eight. It is time for baseball to add in another wild card team. We continue to see so often that wild card teams are able to make a run in the postseason because they are the teams that get hot at the right time right before the season ends. Last year we saw one of the most boring finishes to a baseball season in recent years and it was because almost all of the playoff races were locked up by the end of August. Baseball needs to add another wild card team and this will make for a much more exciting finish. Teams will be in the race longer and will be interested in buying more pieces at the trade deadline if they know that there is another spot for them. This would generate more fan interest and would be better for baseball.
Expanding the rosters to 40 man rosters fromt he start of the season rather than in September would give teams the opportunity to showcase more players at a major league level. There would be more trades and it would bring in more fan interest to the game if they were able to see new players all the time. Fans get tired of watching crappy players on the field while the GM is stuck with not being able to call up prospects due to the 25 man roster rule. Get rid of the 25 man roster and make it 40 which will bring in a lot more excitement.
It's time to get rid of the designated hitter rule. This was an attempt to make baseball mroe exciting and was brought in at a time when the NL and AL were worlds apart from each other to the point where they barely played under the same front office. The DH rule allows old veteran hitters who can still smack a few over the fence but can't catch a ball if they were perfectly positioned to play baseball. It allows pitchers to focuse solely on pitching and it makes managers look good because they have even less to do. The designated hitter has definitely had an effect on the game because it gives the AL an extra hitter. Wonder why the AL dominates interleague play? They have an extra hitter. When NL clubs try to use a DH during away games they have to use a bench player while the AL uses a normal every day guy. It is time to get rid of the rule and let everyone play under the same rules. The pitchers should have to hit, they are part of the game. Having a DH takes away the strategy from the game and there is just no reason for it. The rules should be the same for everyone.
The opportunities for the league lie int he hands of the MLB front office and if they don't realize that now is the time for them to capitalize on other league's lockouts they will never be able to reach their full potential. Baseball has all of the right pieces and it has the opportunity to become the best of the major sports.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Guest On Saturday
UA Cheerleading Captain Jaclyn Weinstein will join the show at 11:30 a.m. She will give us her insights on the state of the Wildcat Basketball team.
Happy Listening
Happy Listening
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Continuing our Texas to the Big Ten Talk
On Saturday during the noon hour, Nick and I talked about the rumors from the Lawrence Journal World about Texas bolting the Big 12 in order to join the Big Ten. This would represent a monumental change in the economics of College Athletics. Today's times have prioritized monetary gain over scholarly achievement.
Here are my main points for Texas to join.
- The Big 10 has it's own TV network which grosses over $200 Million per year. With adding Texas to the Big Ten it could expand its viewership into Dallas and Houston (both are top 10 population markets). With more viewership leads to more money from sponsors from national corporations.
- Texas would gain more exposure because ESPN broadcasts a lot of Big Ten football on all of their networks including ABC. Big 12 games are usually hard to find on basic cable unless it is a Red River Shootout (against Oklahoma) or Lone Star Showdown against other rival Texas A&M. The Big Ten markets are situated as far east as Philadelphia (which covers Penn State Football). As you go East, you increase the amount of money.
- The Big 12 has a lot of teams that typically will receive only local media coverage (Baylor, Texas Tech, Kansas State, Iowa State, Colorado). These aren't traditional powerhouse teams in either football or basketball and thus don't have a national following like Ohio State or Michigan or Penn State. Could you imagine having Ohio State vs. Texas every year?!
- The argument against Texas going to the Big Ten is that it will ruin the Red River Rivalry vs. Oklahoma. My argument for that is USC and Notre Dame play every year and aren't in the same conference. Prior to 1996 Oklahoma and Texas weren't in the same conference but yet they still played each other every year.
- The other argument is that Texas is far away from other teams in the Big Ten, yet Hawaii and Louisiana Tech are in the same conference (WAC) and neither school has as much money to provide travel costs for athletics.
When it comes down to it, it's all about the Green for the Burnt Orange. In this case Ten is better than 12.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Email the Saturday Morning Hangover
The Saturday Morning Hangover now has an e-mail for those who wish to be guests on the show or just to use as another outlet to get your opinion out there.
SMHangover@gmail.com
-Mike
SMHangover@gmail.com
-Mike
Saturday Morning Hangover- the Basics
The Saturday Morning Hangover, with Mike Schlossberg and Nick Sturiale, is an insightful Sports Program on KAMP Student Radio ( kamp.arizona.edu, 1570 AM in the University of Arizona area, Wildcat Mobile on iTouch and iPhone). The show airs at 11:00 AM Arizona Mountain time and will give you the truth about what is going on with University of Arizona Sports, the NFL, MLB, NBA and NCAA Basketball and NCAA Football.
We debate issues in those sports and don't pretend to try and be what we aren't. We will shy away from no controversy and often give you the opinions that your local sports talk homer isn't going to give you. In addition to a deep fan base in Arizona our show has listeners in 3 of the 4 corners of the country (New York, Miami and Southern California), we are still looking to expand our fan base to Seattle and Portland to have all of the corners covered.
During our show, we have many ways for our loyal listeners to get their opinions voiced. First off, we appreciate the calls at 520-621-5806. You can also send and instant message to kamprequest. Additionally, you can tweet us at twitter.com/SMHangover.
Join our facebook group:
Saturday Morning Hangover- with Mike Schlossberg and Nick Sturiale
Become a fan of us at twittertwitter.com/SMHangover
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)